|
| This article does not cite any references or sources. (January 2008) Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed. |
|
|
Please help improve this article or section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. (January 2008) |
Supranationalism is a method of decision-making in political communities, wherein power is held by independent appointed officials or by representatives elected by the legislatures or people of the member states. Member-state governments still have power, but they must share this power with others. Because decisions are taken by majority votes, it is possible for a member-state to be forced by the other member-states to implement a decision. Unlike a federal state, member states fully retain their sovereignty and participate voluntarily, being subject to the supranational government only while remaining members.
The opposite method of decision-making in international organizations is intergovernmentalism.
| The neutrality of this section is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page. This section has been tagged since December 2007. |
Much of the academic community (including Weiler) do not see the European Union as a supranational entity. It is more like akin to an intergovernmental organization, as it does not regulate many aspects of the member states; the states themselves vote for bills by Qualified Majority Voting and The European Council (EC) controls the legislative agenda. It is more a matter of negotiation between the states than that of blanket policy.
The EC can also be described as being a supranational body, examples being the existence of a European Parliament (for democracy), and the democratic deficit in policy making (The Commission setting the agenda). While it is true that the Court of Justice often dictates to Member States how to apply their law, neither the court nor the community institutions can exceed the powers conferred upon them by the treaty. In that sense, they are limited in their actions and therefore the EC could be said to not be a supranational body.
Joseph H. H. Weiler, in his seminal work "The Dual Character of Supranationalism," states that there are two main facets to European supranationalism, although these seem to be true of many supranational systems. These are:
In many ways, the split sees the separation of powers confined to merely two branches.
| This article about an international organization is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia